Natalia Sergeevna Kudinova
Associate Professor of the Department of Criminology of the Saratov State Law Academy, Candidate of Legal Sciences
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Yulia Anatolyevna Panova
Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure of the Volga Institute (branch) VGUU (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia), Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Annotation: The article discusses the development of anti-corruption culture, the problems of expert practice, provides a list of binding moral rules, non-compliance with which leads to expert errors and falsification of expert opinions. Subject of research: legal and ethical aspects of forensic expert activity. The purpose of the work is to analyze the institute of forensic activity. The methodology of the research includes general scientific and special legal research methods: analysis of legal norms, materials of expert practice. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the analysis of the elements of the legal status of an expert in relation to ethical norms, assessment of the reliability of expert opinions and the possibility of their falsification. Conclusions are formulated about the need for further improvement of the procedure for recognizing the expert's opinion as reliable in order to improve the culture of law enforcement in the field under study.

Keywords: expert ethics, expert error, deliberately false conclusion, corruption component.

Elena Nikolaevna Pronina
Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the Volga Institute (branch) VGUU (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia), Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Natalia Leonidovna Romanenko
Deputy Head of the Department of Civil Law of the Saratov Military Order of Zhukov of the Red Banner Institute of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Ekaterina Anatolyevna Ryazanova
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Civil Law of the Saratov Military Order of Zhukov of the Red Banner Institute of the National Guard of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Law
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Annotation: The relevance of the article lies in the fact that at present, the legislator, clearly differentiating between insignificant and disputed transactions — really differing on the grounds of their recognition as such — nevertheless, in some cases operates with the general concept of invalidity, which leads to legal uncertainty. The shortcomings of the current legislation, interpretation and law enforcement practice are identified in order to identify problems of qualifying transactions as void or disputed. The main research methods are logical and method of analysis. The novelty lies in the authors' attempt to develop a common approach to the legal assessment of transactions called invalid by the legislator. The authors come to the conclusion that in order to develop a legal culture, civil legislation needs to be improved, and propose a variant of its change.

Keywords: legal culture, invalidity of transactions, improvement of legislation

Lilia Gennadievna Shcherbakova
Associate Professor of the Arbitration Process Department of the Saratov State Law Academy; Associate Professor of the Civil Law and Process Department of the Volga Institute (branch) VGUU (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia), Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Annotation: Understanding the quality and degree of implementation of digital technologies in legal proceedings makes it possible to identify the weaknesses of such electronic institutions, optimize the rule-making process in this direction. This determines the relevance of the article. The subject of the study is the individual views of scientists concerning the essence of electronic legal proceedings in the administration of justice in civil cases. The purpose of the work is to reveal the essence of electronic legal proceedings in the administration of justice in civil cases, to understand the relationship between the concepts of "electronic justice", "electronic legal proceedings", "informatization of courts". The authors used the laws of formal logic, the method of system analysis, and the comparative legal method as methods of scientific research. Results: the author's position regarding the incorrect use of the terms "electronic justice", "electronic legal proceedings" and "informatization of courts" is formulated. The article analyzes the term "electronic justice" and concludes that "information technologies in court proceedings", "informatization of courts", "electronic court proceedings" are not identical and different in scope categories, while the concept of "electronic justice" includes the rest.

Keywords: electronic justice, electronic court proceedings, artificial intelligence, court informatization, information technologies in court proceedings, digital transformation, digital technologies.

Vyacheslav Yesenovich Khaliulin
Associate Professor of the Department of Theory of Law of the Volga Institute of Management – branch of RANEPA, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Alexey Aleksandrovich Shapovalov
Associate Professor of the Department of State Legal Regulation of Economics and Personnel Policy of the Socio-Economic Institute of the Saratov State Technical University named after Yu. A. Gagarin, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Abstract: The relevance of the work is due to the importance of studying the impact of the information space on the modern education system. The subject of the study is the processes of changing the educational system under the influence of informatization. The key objective of the study is to determine the directions of changes in the higher education system in modern society. The analysis of legal and psychological-pedagogical literature on the problem of research, logical and systematic methods of cognition were used in the work. The novelty of the research consists in the formulation of the problem of changing approaches to existing pedagogical practices. As a result, the changes taking place in society under the influence of digitalization were considered and analyzed, the problem of changing the behavior and consciousness of students was identified and, as a result, the need to change the existing approach to classical forms and types of pedagogical activity was identified. The results of the research can be used and taken into account in practical pedagogical work, as well as in the framework of theoretical understanding of new pedagogical realities.I

Yulia Fanilevna Aitova
Assistant of the Department of Civil Law of the Saratov State Law Academy
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Annotation: The sole executive body acts as an important figure of the economic society, therefore, the question of the corporate culture of conflict situations arising in the relations between them is currently relevant. The subject of the article is legislative norms, scientific views on the legal nature of conflicts arising between the sole executive body and the economic society. The purpose of the work is to analyze the legal doctrine and legislative acts on the nature of conflicts in the relations under consideration. The methodology of the conducted research consists of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, system-structural, etc.) and private scientific (comparative legal, logical-legal, etc.) methods. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the author proceeds from the concept of the corporate and labor status of the sole executive body of a business company. In this connection, the article examines the nature of labor and corporate conflicts. The results of the study will allow us to form a comprehensive opinion on the nature of conflicts between the sole executive body and the economic society

Keywords: sole executive body, business company, conflict, labor conflict, corporate conflict, dispute, corporate culture

Polina Vladislavovna Korshunova
Postgraduate student of the Department of Copyright, Related Rights and Private Law Disciplines of the Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Annotation: :The relevance of the chosen topic is due to the need to determine the balance of human rights and opportunities and artificial intelligence. The subject of the article is the study of the concept of "artificial intelligence" through the prism of philosophy and legal culture. The purpose of the work is to understand the essence of artificial intelligence and the probability of its equality with humans. Methodology: methods of scientific cognition (including dialectical method), private law methods. The novelty of the article is reflected in the main results of the study, which consist in substantiating the applicability and creation of legal norms regulating the relationship between human and non-human mind, and can be applied in legal science. Conclusions: a balance in the issue of equality between artificial intelligence and man is possible if the "human rights" of the machine are respected, since their rejection will be an obstacle to the analysis of the human opposite.

Information about the authors: Alexander V.MALKO – Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of State and Legal Disciplines of the Volga Institute (branch) All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia) GORBAN Vladimir Sergeevich – Doctor of Law, Chief Researcher of the Sector of Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law, Head of the Interdisciplinary Center for Philosophical and Legal Studies of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences Andrey Petrovich MAZURENKO – Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of State and Legal Disciplines of the Pyatigorsk Institute (branch) North Caucasus Federal University